29

Someone who looks for a Stack Exchange website about Vim may type vim.stackexchange.com directly into the URL bar of their browser. This will get an unhelpful page saying that no such Stack Exchange site exists. Since Vi and Vim Stack Exchange does exist, I propose that the former redirect to the latter.

| |
  • 2
    But you get to see a picture of a cute panda bear! – Martin Tournoij Mar 16 '15 at 18:12
  • 4
    I've actually thought that vim should be the main (maybe only) subdomain for the site. Correct me if I'm wrong, but these days isn't it practically impossible to use the original vi? Even when you enter vi on your system, it's usually an alias to vim set to behave differently. – tommcdo Mar 24 '15 at 21:31
  • 3
    @tommcdo Arch Linux ships with the 'original vi' by default. All the BSD systems ship with nvi by default. I believe most 'enterprise UNIX' systems such as Solaris, HP-UX, IRIX, etc. also ship with their own vi flavours. In addition, there are a number of other vi-clones one could use, such as elvis, vile, etc.... It's true that Vim is by far the most popular vi clone around, but willthis still be the case in 5 or 10 years? Perhaps. Perhaps not. Especially on the desktop, s/prog1/prog2/ can happen quite fast... – Martin Tournoij Mar 25 '15 at 15:34
  • @Carpetsmoker, fair point, I'll take it. – tommcdo Mar 25 '15 at 16:39
8

Not sure when this was added, but http://vim.stackexchange.com currently redirects to http://vi.stackexchange.com :-)

| |

You must log in to answer this question.