Timeline for Should we have separate tags [vi] and [vim]?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2015 at 18:31 | comment | added | yo' | @derobert Having experience from the TeX - LaTeX site, I would suggest not: the B.J.'s original should get a longer tag name, otherwise people never use it correctly. We ended with tex-core and plain-tex, and we blacklisted latex for question about LaTeX itself in favour of latex-project. I would suggest original-vi for the B.J.'s version. | |
| Feb 3, 2015 at 17:16 | comment | added | derobert |
Should the vi tag refer only to the Bill Joy original?
|
|
| Feb 3, 2015 at 17:01 | history | answered | tgrosinger | CC BY-SA 3.0 |