Timeline for Tag [command] vs. [user-commands] confusion
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15 at 21:25 | vote | accept | Friedrich | ||
| Jun 9 at 6:27 | answer | added | Friedrich | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 9 at 6:24 | comment | added | Friedrich |
Technically, normal mode commands are "commands" as well which would include commands like / or i. I did miss that last night but, yes, there's [ex-command] as well. Its info is something about the history of ex (I don't get how that would be helpful) but that's easily improved.
|
|
| Jun 8 at 22:59 | comment | added | D. Ben Knoble Mod | For Ex commands, I'd have expected ex or a command-specific tag, maybe? Also, general confusion arises from the fact that some folks call Normal mode Command mode. Then there's the "just because it's in the question doesn't mean it needs a tag"—tags should be things folks can be experts in, ostensibly | |
| S Jun 8 at 21:34 | answer | added | Friedrich | timeline score: 0 | |
| S Jun 8 at 21:34 | history | asked | Friedrich | CC BY-SA 4.0 |